Skip to content
Expert landscaping and gardening services across London. We…

Will Different Nations Emulate Australia's Lead in Banning Social Media for Youth Under Sixteen?

The nation's controversial action to restrict social platforms access for young people below 16 is sending ripples internationally. Lawmakers, child protection groups, and families are observing intently to see if this strategy will become a template for countries abroad.

Across Europe Trend

In Europe, a rising chorus of countries are moving toward parallel bans.

  • The Danish government plans a ban on social media for youth below 15, with the PM declaring that phones and apps are "robbing our children's youth". The policy may be formalized soon.
  • Norway is preparing to introduce a minimum age limit of 15, highlighting the need to protect the young from the "power of the algorithms".
  • Ireland is introducing a online verification tool to authenticate the identity and age of social media participants. The media minister have indicated that an similar ban could be "one of the measures under consideration".
  • In Spain, the prime minister has called on lawmakers to pass a bill increasing the minimum age for accessing social media to 16.
  • In France, the head of state has floated the idea of a ban for under-15s, and a legislative committee has recommended a comparable action, including an overnight "digital curfew" for adolescents.
  • The authorities in the Netherlands has advised families to prevent their youngsters from social media up to the age of 15.

For the broader EU, the EU parliament has adopted a non-binding statement supporting a ban for teenagers under 16 without a parent decides otherwise is granted. Even though it cautions of the "compulsive" quality of these apps, the resolution does not establish enforceable legislation.

"An effective age limit is a useful starting point," commented one MEP driving the measure.

Britain: A Watchful Stance

Across Britain, the leadership has remained open to a future ban, emphasizing that "nothing is discarded" but stressing any decision must be "grounded in robust data".

Earlier, momentum built behind a legislative effort to introduce controls on social media use by teenagers, but it was eventually modified. Instead, the government vowed to further research the topic.

Charities have expressed warnings. One foundation founded by the loved ones of a girl who died after encountering harmful online content argues that a strict age ban could fail to make platforms safer and could lead to a "cliff edge" of harm when teens reach the legal age.

"Australia's ban is a response to the inability of the Silicon Valley to design products and services that are safe and suitable for young users," commented a leading peer.

The US: A State-by-State Picture

Across America, action is primarily occurring at the regional level due to national inaction.

  • Utah requires guardian permission for under-18s to use social media and restricts nighttime use.
  • Florida has passed a bill prohibiting children under fourteen from accessing social media, though it faces legal challenges.
  • The state of Virginia has enacted a rule restricting minors to 60 minutes of social media use per day, with extra access dependent on adult consent.
  • Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have likewise enacted laws mandating guardian approval for minors to set up social media profiles.

Even with bipartisan support and calls from various politicians to mimic Australia's lead, a nationwide ban is currently seen as a distant prospect.

Global Outlook

Beyond Europe and the US, additional states are likewise exploring options.

  • Malaysia plans to restrict social media for teenagers beginning next year.
  • Brazil has raised the required age for Instagram to 16.

However, global organizations strike a more nuanced position. Unicef has warned that blanket prohibitions have downsides and "might prove counterproductive". The body notes that the internet can be a "lifeline" for marginalized children and that bans should not be a "excuse" for tech companies to prioritize user protection.

While this international discussion continues, the steps of this nation and several other countries show that governments internationally are no longer willing to wait for tech companies to self-regulate.

AN
About the author

Amanda Newton

James is a seasoned landscape architect with over a decade of experience transforming urban gardens across London.

London Reels Service

Type to search articles.